Apple A19 Pro vs Unisoc T616
77.4CPU20.1
64.9GPU23.6
74.7Benchmarks—
72AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based20
6 spec wins — Apple A19 Pro1 spec wins — Unisoc T616
InnoReviews verdict
Apple A19 Pro wins this mobile chipset face-off, 73.5 to 21.3, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+57) and GPU (+41). Unisoc T616 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A19 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 77 vs 20
- Stronger GPU score: 65 vs 24
- 4285% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 5,700 vs 130
- 774% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,800 vs 435
- 512% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 9,500 vs 1,553
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T616
- 33% higher cores: 8 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2022 |
| Process | 3 nm+75% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8+33% |
| Core configuration | 2x4.26 GHz + 4x2.6 GHz | 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 4.26 GHz+113% | 2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core, Neural Accelerators) | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU clock | — | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | — |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-9600 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X80) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 90Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@120fps | 1080p@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A19 Pro | Unisoc T616 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,200,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,800+774%Top 3% | 435Bottom 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,500+512%Top 6% | 1,553Bottom 17% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,700+4285%Top 12% | 130Bottom 2% |