Google Tensor G2 vs Huawei Kirin 9000S
36.6CPU32
36.2GPU31.3
48.6Benchmarks46.6
58.3Efficiency34.5
8 spec wins — Google Tensor G21 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G2 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 42.8 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+24) and GPU (+5). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 32
- Stronger GPU score: 36 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 58 vs 35
- 38% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,800 vs 1,300
- 36% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,430 vs 1,050
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm+29% | 7 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz+9% | 2.62 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 | Maleoon 910 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz+13% | 750 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Huawei Kirin 9000S |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 780,000+8%Top 44% | 720,000Top 46% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430+36%Top 30% | 1,050Top 44% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,450+5%Top 35% | 3,300Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800+38%Top 57% | 1,300Top 68% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VS

