Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
36.6CPU57.2
36.2GPU54.3
48.6Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
58.3Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G28 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 42.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+26) and efficiency (+21). Google Tensor G2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 49
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 58
- 176% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 780,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2025 |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm+40% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz | 3.3 GHz+16% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 780,000Top 44% | 2,150,000+176%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430Top 30% | 2,300+61%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,450Top 35% | 8,200+138%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Top 57% | 4,400+144%Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

