Google Tensor G2 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
30.6CPU57.9
31.8GPU54
36.2Benchmarks73.1
0AI85.9
58.3Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G28 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 36.8, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+86) and benchmarks (+37). Google Tensor G2 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G2
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 32
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 36
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 58
- 176% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 780,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2025 |
| Process | 5 nm | 3 nm+40% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz | 3.3 GHz+16% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G710 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G2 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 780,000 | 2,150,000+176% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,430 | 2,300+61% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,450 | 8,200+138% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800 | 4,400+144% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G2vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensor G2vs Google TensorVSGoogle Tensor G2vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSGoogle Tensor G2vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

