Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2500
62.5CPU58.4
48.9GPU60.5
62.2Benchmarks74.2
72AIspec-based85.9
79.6Efficiencyspec-based79.6
2 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro5 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 68 to 62.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+12) and GPU (+12). Apple A17 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 58
- 18% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,926 vs 2,478
- 15% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger GPU score: 61 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 62
- 69% higher AI performance: 59 TOPS vs 35 TOPS
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 38% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 5,166 vs 3,746
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | 59 TOPS+69% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,334,021Top 42% | 2,150,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 320,136Bottom 42% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 446,750Top 35% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 169,688Bottom 43% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 397,447Top 37% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,926+18%Top 8% | 2,478Top 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,237Top 12% | 8,098+12%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,746Top 18% | 5,166+38%Top 10% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9400eVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VS

