Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2500
64.1CPU57.9
46GPU54
58.8Benchmarks73.1
72AI85.9
79.6Efficiency79.6
2 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 61.6, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+14) and AI (+14). Apple A17 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 64 vs 58
- 28% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 2,300
- 15% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 46
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 59
- Stronger AI score: 86 vs 72
- 69% higher AI performance: 59 TOPS vs 35 TOPS
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | 59 TOPS+69% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,450,000 | 2,150,000+48% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+28% | 2,300 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250 | 8,200+13% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600 | 4,400+22% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VS

