Apple A17 Pro vs Samsung Exynos 2500
62.7CPU57.2
47.8GPU54.3
64.2Benchmarks74.2
72AIspec-based85.9
79.6Efficiencyspec-based79.6
2 spec wins — Apple A17 Pro6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 62.7, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+10) and GPU (+7). Apple A17 Pro still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Apple A17 Pro
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 57
- 28% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,950 vs 2,300
- 15% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 48
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 64
- 69% higher AI performance: 59 TOPS vs 35 TOPS
- 67% higher cores: 10 vs 6
- 48% higher AnTuTu: 2,150,000 vs 1,450,000
General
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.6 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 10+67% |
| Core configuration | 2x3.78 GHz + 4x2.11 GHz | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Apple GPU (6-core) | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | 16-core Neural Engine | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 35 TOPS | 59 TOPS+69% |
Memory
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Snapdragon X70) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Apple A17 Pro | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,450,000 | 2,150,000+48% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,950+28%Top 10% | 2,300Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,250Top 14% | 8,200+13%Top 11% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,600Top 31% | 4,400+22%Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Apple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSApple A17 Provs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSApple A17 Provs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

