Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
63.3CPU57.2
53.8GPU54.3
72.3Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
84Efficiencyspec-based79.6
3 spec wins — Google Tensor G64 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Google Tensor G6 scores 66.1 against 66.1 for Samsung Exynos 2500. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Google Tensor G6 edges ahead in CPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
- Stronger CPU score: 63 vs 57
- 24% higher Max clock: 4.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz
- 18% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,724 vs 2,300
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- 43% higher cores: 10 vs 7
- 29% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 3,420
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 10+43% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz+24% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,994,033 | 2,150,000+8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724+18%Top 11% | 2,300Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535Top 12% | 8,200+9%Top 10% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420Top 33% | 4,400+29%Top 19% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

