Samsung Exynos 1680 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
38.7CPU57.2
40.8GPU54.3
62.7Benchmarks74.2
56.5AIspec-based85.9
68Efficiencyspec-based79.6
1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 16808 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 50.2, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+19) and GPU (+14). Samsung Exynos 1680 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1680
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 39
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 63
- 201% higher AI performance: 59 TOPS vs 20 TOPS
- 153% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 1,742
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.9 GHz | 3.3 GHz+14% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 550 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 1,200 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 20 TOPS | 59 TOPS+201% |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.1 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 1680 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,363,464 | 2,150,000+58% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,376Top 35% | 2,300+67%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,411Top 29% | 8,200+86%Top 10% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,742Top 62% | 4,400+153%Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 1680vs Apple A15 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1680vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Google Tensor G4VSSamsung Exynos 1680vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVS

