MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Samsung Exynos 2500
66.2CPU58.4
69.8GPU60.5
80.7Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
77.2Efficiencyspec-based79.6
4 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400+2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ wins this mobile chipset face-off, 72.3 to 68, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+9) and CPU (+8). Samsung Exynos 2500 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 58
- Stronger GPU score: 70 vs 61
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 74
- 22% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,300 vs 5,166
- 17% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,900 vs 2,478
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2025 |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 8 W+11% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.73 GHz+13% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,784,235Top 10% | 2,150,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 829,825Top 10% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 946,941Top 10% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 370,838Top 7% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 636,631Top 7% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,900+17%Top 8% | 2,478Top 11% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,000+11%Top 7% | 8,098Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,300+22%Top 7% | 5,166Top 10% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Xiaomi XRING O1VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500sVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VS

