Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
51.7CPU57.2
49.4GPU54.3
71.2Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
66.5Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24008 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+13) and CPU (+6). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 71
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 67
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 8 W+11% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,914,857Top 12% | 2,150,000+12%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150Top 16% | 2,300+7%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600Top 15% | 8,200+24%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 21% | 4,400+16%Top 17% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | 637,914Top 26% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | 562,338Top 29% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | 289,405Top 40% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | 425,200Top 29% | — |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

