Samsung Exynos 2400 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
51.7CPU57.2
49.4GPU54.3
71.2Benchmarks74.2
—AIspec-based85.9
66.5Efficiencyspec-based79.6
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 24007 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 57.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+6) and GPU (+5). Samsung Exynos 2400 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 52
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 71
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
- 24% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 6,600
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 8 W+11% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+3% |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 940 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2400 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,914,857Top 34% | 2,150,000 |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 637,914Top 31% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 562,338Top 34% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 289,405Top 45% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 425,200Top 34% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,150Top 18% | 2,300+7%Top 14% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,600Top 17% | 8,200+24%Top 11% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 25% | 4,400+16%Top 20% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2400vs Google Tensor G5VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVS

