Samsung Exynos 2500 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
58.4CPU72.6
60.5GPU77.4
74.2Benchmarks81.1
85.9AIspec-based—
79.6Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 25005 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 68, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+17) and CPU (+14). Samsung Exynos 2500 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 58
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 61
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 74
- 40% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 5,166
- 34% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 8,098
General
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 10 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.3 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Samsung Xclipse 950 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Samsung NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | 59 TOPS | — |
Memory
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem | — |
Media
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Samsung Exynos 2500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 2,150,000 | 2,827,538Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 15% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 24% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,478Top 11% | 2,995+21%Top 7% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 8,098Top 9% | 10,824+34%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 5,166Top 10% | 7,230+40%Top 5% |
Related comparisons
Samsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Google Tensor G6VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Xiaomi Xring O3VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVS

