MediaTek Dimensity 9500 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
75.5CPU72.6
73.2GPU77.4
84.6Benchmarks81.1
77.2Efficiencyspec-based100
7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 95005 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 77.2, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+4). MediaTek Dimensity 9500 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9500
- Stronger benchmarks score: 85 vs 81
- 46% higher AnTuTu 11 (UX): 699,687 vs 479,728
- 16% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,218,443 vs 1,052,625
- 15% higher AnTuTu: 3,254,273 vs 2,827,538
- 13% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 3,397 vs 2,995
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 73
- 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra + 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium + 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 4.21 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali G1-Ultra MC12 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 990 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 3,254,273+15%Top 4% | 2,827,538Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 976,567+3%Top 4% | 947,776Top 5% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 1,218,443+16%Top 4% | 1,052,625Top 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 359,576+4%Top 12% | 347,409Top 15% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 699,687+46%Top 5% | 479,728Top 24% |
| AnTuTu 12 | 3,359,977+6%Top 7% | 3,169,279Top 10% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 3,397+13%Top 5% | 2,995Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 10,166Top 5% | 10,824+6%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,721Top 4% | 7,230+8%Top 3% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9600MVSMediaTek Dimensity 9500vs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500MVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9600MVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Xiaomi Xring O3VS

