Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 9500M vs Samsung Exynos 2600

MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
—Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 2600
80.4Inno Score
78.9CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
—Benchmarks81.1
84Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9500M2 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M

  • Stronger CPU score: 79 vs 73

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600

  • 33% lower process: 2 nm vs 3 nm
  • 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9500MSamsung Exynos 2600
Announced20262026
Process3 nm2 nm+33%
ArchitectureARMv9.3-AArmv9.3

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9500MSamsung Exynos 2600
Cores810+25%
Core configuration1x C1-Ultra + 3x C1-Premium + 4x C1-Pro1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency)
Max clock4.21 GHz—

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9500MSamsung Exynos 2600
GPUArm Mali-G1 Ultra MC11Samsung Xclipse 960

AI

AI comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9500MSamsung Exynos 2600
NPU—Samsung NPU

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9500MSamsung Exynos 2600
Memory typeLPDDR5X—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9500MSamsung Exynos 2600
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7—
Bluetooth6.0—

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M versus Samsung Exynos 2600
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9500MSamsung Exynos 2600
AnTuTu—2,827,538Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—947,776Top 9%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,052,625Top 12%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—347,409Top 23%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—479,728Top 25%
Geekbench 6 (single)—2,995Top 9%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—10,824Top 4%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—7,230Top 7%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup