Google Tensor G6 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
63.3CPU72.6
53.8GPU77.4
72.3Benchmarks81.1
84Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G65 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 66.1, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+24) and CPU (+9). Google Tensor G6 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G6
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 63
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 54
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 72
- 111% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 3,420
- 44% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 7,535
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2026 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | 2 nm+33% |
| Architecture | Armv9.3 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 7 | 10+43% |
| Core configuration | 1x4.1 GHz ARM C1-Ultra + 4x3.4 GHz ARM C1-Pro + 2x2.65 GHz ARM C1-Pro | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 4.1 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR CXTP-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
| GPU clock | 1,286 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google TPU | Samsung NPU |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 6.0 | — |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G6 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,994,033 | 2,827,538Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,724Top 12% | 2,995+10%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,535Top 13% | 10,824+44%Top 5% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,420Top 35% | 7,230+111%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G6vs Samsung Exynos 2500VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18VSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A18 ProVSGoogle Tensor G6vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

