Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
41.6CPU57.2
41GPU54.3
52.2Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
69Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G38 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 48.4, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+22) and CPU (+16). Google Tensor G3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G3
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 42
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 41
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 52
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 69
- 139% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 900,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 9 | 10+11% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X3 + 4x2.37 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.91 GHz | 3.3 GHz+13% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 890 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 900,000Top 36% | 2,150,000+139%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,750Top 25% | 2,300+31%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350Top 26% | 8,200+89%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400Top 47% | 4,400+83%Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G3vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSGoogle Tensor G3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

