Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
37.1CPU57.9
37.6GPU54
41.4Benchmarks73.1
0AI85.9
69Efficiency79.6
0 spec wins — Google Tensor G38 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 43.5, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+86) and benchmarks (+32). Google Tensor G3 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G3
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 38
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 41
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 69
- 139% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 900,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 9 | 10+11% |
| Core configuration | 1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X3 + 4x2.37 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.91 GHz | 3.3 GHz+13% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 890 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5300) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G3 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 900,000 | 2,150,000+139% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,750 | 2,300+31% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,350 | 8,200+89% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,400 | 4,400+83% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G3vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Apple A14 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G3vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSGoogle Tensor G3vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

