Google Tensor G4 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
41.4CPU57.9
40GPU54
47Benchmarks73.1
0AI85.9
71.4Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — Google Tensor G48 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66 to 47.3, pulling ahead mainly in AI (+86) and benchmarks (+26). Google Tensor G4 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G4
- 12% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 58 vs 41
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 40
- Stronger benchmarks score: 73 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 71
- 105% higher AnTuTu 10: 2,150,000 vs 1,050,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+12% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.3 GHz+6% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G715 MC7 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
| GPU clock | 940 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5400) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G4 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,050,000 | 2,150,000+105% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,950 | 2,300+18% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,700 | 8,200+74% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600 | 4,400+69% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G4vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Apple A15 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSGoogle Tensor G4vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

