Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
55CPU27.4
45.7GPU—
60.5Benchmarks42.4
82.1Efficiency65.6
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G51 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1330
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 40.8, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+28) and benchmarks (+18). Samsung Exynos 1330 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 27
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 42
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 66
- 188% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 6,200 vs 2,150
- 140% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 960
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1330
- 29% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+40% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 5 W+29% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+57% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G68 MP2 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+106%Top 25% | 608,174Top 52% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+140%Top 12% | 960Top 54% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+188%Top 18% | 2,150Top 61% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 33% | — |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 248,088Top 89% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 42,913Top 98% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 129,402Top 95% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 187,771Top 89% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1330vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 1330vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VS
