Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
55CPU51.7
45.7GPU49.4
60.5Benchmarks71.2
82.1Efficiency66.5
5 spec wins — Google Tensor G54 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400
InnoReviews verdict
This one is close to a dead heat: Google Tensor G5 scores 58.2 against 57.9 for Samsung Exynos 2400. Pick by the categories that matter to you — Google Tensor G5 edges ahead in efficiency and CPU, or by price.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 52
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 67
- 25% lower process: 3 nm vs 4 nm
- 22% lower TDP (typical): 7 W vs 9 W
- 18% higher Max clock: 3.78 GHz vs 3.2 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400
- Stronger GPU score: 49 vs 46
- Stronger benchmarks score: 71 vs 61
- 53% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,914,857 vs 1,250,000
- 25% higher cores: 10 vs 8
- 13% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,800 vs 3,350
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+18% | 3.2 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000Top 25% | 1,914,857+53%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+7%Top 12% | 2,150Top 16% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200Top 18% | 6,600+6%Top 15% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 33% | 3,800+13%Top 21% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 637,914Top 26% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 562,338Top 29% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 289,405Top 40% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 425,200Top 29% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVS

