Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
55CPU29.2
45.7GPU25
60.5Benchmarks47.3
82.1Efficiency63.2
7 spec wins — Google Tensor G51 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1380
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 37.7, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+26) and GPU (+21). Samsung Exynos 1380 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 29
- Stronger GPU score: 46 vs 25
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 47
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 63
- 315% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,350 vs 808
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1380
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2023 |
| Process | 3 nm+40% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 6 W+14% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+57% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G68 MP5 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1380 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+69%Top 25% | 740,251Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+128%Top 12% | 1,010Top 50% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+125%Top 18% | 2,760Top 50% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350+315%Top 33% | 808Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 290,514Top 80% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 89,805Top 83% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 132,447Top 92% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 227,485Top 75% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870VSSamsung Exynos 1380vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080VS

