Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
55CPU33.7
45.7GPU28.2
60.5Benchmarks54.8
82.1Efficiency73.8
7 spec wins — Google Tensor G51 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1480
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 43.5, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+21) and GPU (+18). Samsung Exynos 1480 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 34
- Stronger GPU score: 46 vs 28
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 55
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 74
- 179% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,350 vs 1,200
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1480
- 14% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2024 |
| Process | 3 nm+25% | 4 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 6 W+14% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+37% | 2.75 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Samsung Xclipse 530 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 144Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 1480 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+25%Top 25% | 997,950Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+100%Top 12% | 1,150Top 39% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+82%Top 18% | 3,400Top 36% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350+179%Top 33% | 1,200Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 353,082Top 60% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 224,206Top 49% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 162,521Top 66% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 258,141Top 66% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSSamsung Exynos 1480vs Google Tensor G2VS

