Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
54.2CPU31.2
43.5GPU29.3
53.4Benchmarks39.3
0AI64
82.1Efficiency55.9
8 spec wins — Google Tensor G50 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 55.7 to 39.4, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+26) and CPU (+23). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 54 vs 31
- Stronger GPU score: 44 vs 29
- Stronger benchmarks score: 53 vs 39
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 56
- 123% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,350 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2021 |
| Process | 3 nm+40% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+30% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+47% | 850,000 |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+61% | 1,430 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+75% | 3,550 |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350+123% | 1,500 |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

