Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
55CPU37.1
45.7GPU34.2
60.5Benchmarks47.5
—AI64
82.1Efficiency55.9
8 spec wins — Google Tensor G50 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 44, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+26) and CPU (+18). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 37
- Stronger GPU score: 46 vs 34
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 48
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 56
- 123% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 3,350 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2021 |
| Process | 3 nm+40% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W+22% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+30% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+67%Top 25% | 746,547Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+61%Top 12% | 1,430Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+75%Top 18% | 3,550Top 34% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350+123%Top 33% | 1,500Top 65% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 252,025Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 127,819Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 144,909Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 221,794Top 78% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

