Google Tensor G5 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
55CPU21.6
45.7GPU—
60.5Benchmarks20
82.1Efficiency44.2
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G51 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9611
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 26.3, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+41) and efficiency (+38). Samsung Exynos 9611 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 22
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 44
- 557% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 350
- 481% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,250,000 vs 215,000
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9611
- 29% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2019 |
| Process | 3 nm+70% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 5 W+29% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+64% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Samsung Exynos 9611 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+481%Top 25% | 215,000Top 93% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+557%Top 12% | 350Top 89% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+396%Top 18% | 1,250Top 90% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 33% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G88VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs MediaTek Helio G85VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSSamsung Exynos 9611vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VS
