Google Tensor G5 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
55CPU20
45.7GPU—
60.5Benchmarks20
82.1Efficiency46.7
6 spec wins — Google Tensor G51 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
Google Tensor G5 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 58.2 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+41) and efficiency (+35). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor G5
- Stronger CPU score: 55 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 61 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 82 vs 47
- 448% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,300 vs 420
- 400% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,250,000 vs 250,000
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 43% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 7 W
General
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2021 |
| Process | 3 nm+75% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | 4 W+43% |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.78 GHz Cortex-X4 + 5x3.05 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A520 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.78 GHz+110% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Imagination PowerVR DXT-48-1536 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (MediaTek T900) | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor G5 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,250,000+400%Top 25% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,300+448%Top 12% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 6,200+313%Top 18% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,350Top 33% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensor G5vs Samsung Exynos 2400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200+VSGoogle Tensor G5vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSGoogle Tensor G5vs Apple A16 BionicVSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS