Google Tensor vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
28.4CPU30.8
31GPU28
31.2Benchmarks43.4
58.3Efficiency73.8
1 spec wins — Google Tensor7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 8200
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 40 to 34.7, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+16) and benchmarks (+12). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger GPU score: 31 vs 28
- 14% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,340 vs 1,180
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
- Stronger benchmarks score: 43 vs 31
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 58
- 40% higher AnTuTu 10: 950,000 vs 680,000
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2022 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | 6 W+25% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz+11% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | MediaTek APU 580 |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 51.2 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@60fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000 | 950,000+40% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340+14% | 1,180 |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150 | 3,750+19% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700 | 1,800+6% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Google Tensor G2VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVS

