MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
36.6CPU37.1
33.1GPU34.2
53.6Benchmarks47.5
—AIspec-based64
73.8Efficiencyspec-based55.9
6 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 82001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 45.6 to 44, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+6). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 48
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 20% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,800 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- 21% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,430 vs 1,180
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+7% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 580 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 950,000 | 746,547Bottom 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 252,025Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 127,819Bottom 31% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 144,909Bottom 17% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 221,794Bottom 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Top 40% | 1,430+21%Top 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,750+6%Top 37% | 3,550Top 38% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800+20%Bottom 42% | 1,500Bottom 35% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VS