MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
36.6CPU37.1
33.1GPU34.2
53.6Benchmarks47.5
—AIspec-based64
73.8Efficiencyspec-based55.9
6 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 82001 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 45.6 to 44, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+6). Samsung Exynos 2100 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 48
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 9 W
- 20% lower process: 4 nm vs 5 nm
- 20% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,800 vs 1,500
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- 21% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,430 vs 1,180
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+20% | 5 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+33% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+7% | 2.9 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | — | 854 MHz |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 580 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR5 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 950,000 | 746,547Bottom 24% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 252,025Bottom 18% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 127,819Bottom 32% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 144,909Bottom 21% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 221,794Bottom 32% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Top 40% | 1,430+21%Top 28% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,750+6%Top 35% | 3,550Top 37% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800+20%Top 39% | 1,500Top 45% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Huawei Kirin T93 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VS