Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
34.9CPU49.9
35.5GPU47.8
45.2Benchmarks66.7
58.3Efficiency66.5
1 spec wins — Google Tensor8 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2400e
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2400e wins this mobile chipset face-off, 55.8 to 41.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+22) and CPU (+15). Google Tensor still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- 11% lower TDP (typical): 8 W vs 9 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2400e
- Stronger CPU score: 50 vs 35
- Stronger GPU score: 48 vs 36
- Stronger benchmarks score: 67 vs 45
- Stronger efficiency score: 67 vs 58
- 135% higher AnTuTu 10: 1,600,000 vs 680,000
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2024 |
| Process | 5 nm | 4 nm+20% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W+11% | 9 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 + 2x2.9 GHz Cortex-A720 + 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 + 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz+11% |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | QHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 2400e |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 680,000 | 1,600,000+135% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340 | 2,050+53% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150 | 6,400+103% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700 | 3,600+112% |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1480VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs MediaTek Dimensity 9200VSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Apple A16 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2400evs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2VS

