Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 9610
34.9CPU28
35.5GPU—
45.2Benchmarks—
58.3Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — Google Tensor0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Google Tensor
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 28
- 50% lower process: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- 22% higher Max clock: 2.8 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2018 |
| Process | 5 nm+50% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 + 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 + 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz+22% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G78 MP20 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU clock | 848 MHz | — |
AI
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Google Edge TPU | — |
Memory
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Connectivity
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | External (Samsung Exynos 5123) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | — | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Google Tensor | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 680,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,340Top 34% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,150Top 44% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,700Top 50% | — |
Related comparisons
Google Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VSGoogle Tensorvs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSGoogle Tensorvs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSGoogle Tensorvs Samsung Exynos 1330VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS