Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 9610

H
28Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 9610
—Inno Score
34.1CPU28
25.6GPU—
20Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 80201 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 8020

  • Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 28
  • 30% lower process: 7 nm vs 10 nm

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Samsung Exynos 9610
Announced20252018
Process7 nm+30%10 nm
ArchitectureARM (64-bit, custom HiSilicon cores)Armv8

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Samsung Exynos 9610
Cores88
Core configuration—4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53
Max clock2.28 GHz2.3 GHz+1%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Samsung Exynos 9610
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920cArm Mali-G72 MP3

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Samsung Exynos 9610
Memory type—LPDDR4X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Samsung Exynos 9610
ModemIntegrated 5G modem (unannounced)Integrated LTE Cat-12
Max download—0.6 Gbps
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Samsung Exynos 9610
Max display—WQXGA (2560x1600)
Video capture—4K@120fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 8020 versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin 8020Samsung Exynos 9610
Geekbench 6 (single)1,288Top 36%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,166Top 31%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme882Bottom 30%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup