Huawei Kirin 9000S vs Samsung Exynos 2100
32CPU37.1
31.3GPU34.2
46.6Benchmarks47.5
—AI64
34.5Efficiency55.9
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9000S7 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2100
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2100 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 44 to 35.5, pulling ahead mainly in efficiency (+21) and CPU (+5). Huawei Kirin 9000S still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9000S
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2100
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 32
- Stronger efficiency score: 56 vs 35
- 36% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,430 vs 1,050
- 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm
- 15% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 1,500 vs 1,300
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2021 |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm+29% |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | 9 W |
| Architecture | — | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz Taishan Big + 3x2.15 GHz Taishan Mid + 4x1.53 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x2.9 GHz Cortex-X1 + 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.62 GHz | 2.9 GHz+11% |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Maleoon 910 | Arm Mali-G78 MP14 |
| GPU clock | 750 MHz | 854 MHz+14% |
AI
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | HiSilicon Da Vinci NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem (unannounced) | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9000S | Samsung Exynos 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 720,000Top 46% | 746,547+4%Top 45% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,050Top 44% | 1,430+36%Top 30% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,300Top 38% | 3,550+8%Top 34% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,300Top 68% | 1,500+15%Top 65% |
| AnTuTu 10 (CPU) | — | 252,025Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (GPU) | — | 127,819Top 72% |
| AnTuTu 10 (Memory) | — | 144,909Top 86% |
| AnTuTu 10 (UX) | — | 221,794Top 78% |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9000Svs Unisoc Tiger T820VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSHuawei Kirin 9000Svs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100VSSamsung Exynos 2100vs Google Tensor G2VS

