Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9010 vs Unisoc T765

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T765
—Inno Score
36.2CPU24.5
33.2GPU55
20Efficiencyspec-based36
3 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90102 spec wins — Unisoc T765

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9010

  • Stronger CPU score: 36 vs 25
  • 133% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,484 vs 1,925
  • 96% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,446 vs 736

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765

  • Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 33
  • 14% lower process: 6 nm vs 7 nm
  • 13% higher GPU clock: 850 MHz vs 750 MHz

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T765
Announced20242023
Process7 nm6 nm+14%
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T765
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.3 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.18 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510 Little2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.3 GHz2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T765
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock750 MHz850 MHz+13%

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T765
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T765
Modem—Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T765
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9010 versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin 9010Unisoc T765
Geekbench 6 (single)1,446+96%Top 29%736Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,484+133%Top 28%1,925Bottom 27%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,573Bottom 49%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup