Huawei Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
36.1CPU27.4
36.8GPU—
—Benchmarks42.4
20Efficiencyspec-based65.6
4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90201 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1330
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 1330 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 40.8 to 32.9. Huawei Kirin 9020 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9020
- Stronger CPU score: 36 vs 27
- 110% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 4,505 vs 2,150
- 34% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,285 vs 960
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1330
- 29% lower process: 5 nm vs 7 nm
General
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2023 |
| Process | 7 nm | 5 nm+29% |
| TDP (typical) | — | 5 W |
| Architecture | ARM (in-house HiSilicon cores) | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.15 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.6 GHz HiSilicon Little | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz+4% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | HiSilicon Maleoon 920 | Arm Mali-G68 MP2 |
| GPU clock | 840 MHz | — |
Memory
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | — | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | — | 17.1 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | — | Integrated 5G (sub-6) |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.2 |
Media
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | — | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Huawei Kirin 9020 | Samsung Exynos 1330 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | — | 608,174Bottom 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 248,088Bottom 13% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 42,913Bottom 6% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 129,402Bottom 8% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 187,771Bottom 13% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,285+34%Top 40% | 960Bottom 43% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,505+110%Top 29% | 2,150Bottom 36% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,907Bottom 48% | — |
Related comparisons
Huawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100+VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Unisoc Tiger T760VSHuawei Kirin 9020vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 1330vs Google TensorVSSamsung Exynos 1330vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300VS