Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9020 vs Unisoc T7250

H
32.9Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7250
—Inno Score
36.1CPU20
36.8GPU55
20Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90201 spec wins — Unisoc T7250

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T7250 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9020

  • Stronger CPU score: 36 vs 20
  • 42% lower process: 7 nm vs 12 nm
  • 39% higher Max clock: 2.5 GHz vs 1.8 GHz

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7250

  • Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 37

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9020 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecHuawei Kirin 9020Unisoc T7250
Announced20242024
Process7 nm+42%12 nm
ArchitectureARM (in-house HiSilicon cores)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9020 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecHuawei Kirin 9020Unisoc T7250
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz HiSilicon Big + 3x2.15 GHz HiSilicon Mid + 4x1.6 GHz HiSilicon Little2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.5 GHz+39%1.8 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9020 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecHuawei Kirin 9020Unisoc T7250
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 920Arm Mali-G57
GPU clock840 MHz850 MHz+1%

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9020 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecHuawei Kirin 9020Unisoc T7250
Memory type—LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth—14.9 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9020 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecHuawei Kirin 9020Unisoc T7250
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-Fi—Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth—5.2

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9020 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecHuawei Kirin 9020Unisoc T7250
Max display—FHD+ @ 60Hz / HD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—1080p@60fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9020 versus Unisoc T7250
SpecHuawei Kirin 9020Unisoc T7250
Geekbench 6 (single)1,285Top 40%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)4,505Top 29%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,907Bottom 48%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup