Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9030 vs Unisoc T7300

H
—Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T7300
—Inno Score
40CPU25.3
—GPU65
66.9AIspec-based—
52Efficiencyspec-based36
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 90300 spec wins — Unisoc T7300

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9030 and Unisoc T7300 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin 9030

  • Stronger CPU score: 40 vs 25
  • 25% higher Max clock: 2.75 GHz vs 2.2 GHz
  • 17% lower process: 5 nm vs 6 nm

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T7300

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9030 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9030Unisoc T7300
Announced20252025
Process5 nm+17%6 nm
ArchitectureARM (ARMv8, Taishan V124 cores)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9030 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9030Unisoc T7300
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.75 GHz Taishan V124 Big + 3x2.27 GHz Taishan V124 Mid + 4x1.72 GHz Taishan V124 Tiny2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.75 GHz+25%2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9030 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9030Unisoc T7300
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 935AArm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—950 MHz

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9030 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9030Unisoc T7300
NPUHiSilicon Ascend NPU—
AI performance29 TOPS—

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9030 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9030Unisoc T7300
Memory typeLPDDR5XLPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9030 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9030Unisoc T7300
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-7 (DL) / Cat-13 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5 (Wi-Fi 6 optional)
Bluetooth6.05.4

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9030 versus Unisoc T7300
SpecHuawei Kirin 9030Unisoc T7300
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—2K@30fps

Related comparisons

Try another matchup