Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

H
—Inno Score
VS
Q
21.3Inno Score
—CPU23.1
—GPU20
—Efficiencyspec-based20
1 spec wins — Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 678

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
Announced20262020
Process—11 nm
Architecture—Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
Cores—8
Core configuration—2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold (Cortex-A76) + 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver (Cortex-A55)
Max clock—2.2 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
GPU—Qualcomm Adreno 612

AI

AI comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
NPU—Qualcomm Hexagon 685

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
Memory type—LPDDR4/LPDDR4X-1866
Max bandwidth—14.9 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
Modem—Qualcomm Snapdragon X12 LTE
Max download—0.6 Gbps
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
Max display—FHD+ @ 60Hz
Video capture4K4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin 9050 Pro versus Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
SpecHuawei Kirin 9050 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 678
Geekbench 6 (single)—716Bottom 26%
Geekbench 6 (multi)—1,640Bottom 20%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme—142Bottom 6%

Related comparisons

Try another matchup