Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T90A vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500M

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
—Inno Score
34.4CPU78.9
28.4GPU—
—Benchmarks83.8
—Efficiencyspec-based84
0 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9500M

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: MediaTek Dimensity 9500M lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M

  • Stronger CPU score: 79 vs 34
  • 68% higher Max clock: 4.21 GHz vs 2.5 GHz

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AMediaTek Dimensity 9500M
Announced20242026
Process—3 nm
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)ARMv9.3-A

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AMediaTek Dimensity 9500M
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little1x C1-Ultra + 3x C1-Premium + 4x C1-Pro
Max clock2.5 GHz4.21 GHz+68%

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AMediaTek Dimensity 9500M
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Arm Mali-G1 Ultra MC11

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AMediaTek Dimensity 9500M
Memory type—LPDDR5X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AMediaTek Dimensity 9500M
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 7
Bluetooth5.26.0

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AMediaTek Dimensity 9500M
AnTuTu—3,157,641Top 8%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—890,270Top 10%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—1,121,441Top 8%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—431,821Top 3%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—714,109Top 5%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,229Top 37%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,987Top 33%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,233Bottom 39%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup