Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T90A vs Samsung Exynos 1330

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
WINNER
Samsung Exynos 1330
40.8Inno Score
34.4CPU27.4
28.4GPU—
—Benchmarks42.4
—Efficiencyspec-based65.6
4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1330

InnoReviews verdict

Samsung Exynos 1330 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 40.8 to 31.7. Huawei Kirin T90A still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A

  • Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 27
  • 85% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,987 vs 2,150
  • 28% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,229 vs 960

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1330

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 1330
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 1330
Announced20242023
Process—5 nm
TDP (typical)—5 W
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 1330
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 1330
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.5 GHz+4%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 1330
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 1330
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Arm Mali-G68 MP2

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 1330
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 1330
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth—17.1 GB/s

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 1330
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 1330
Modem—Integrated 5G (sub-6)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.2

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 1330
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 1330
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 1330
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu—608,174Bottom 12%
AnTuTu 11 (CPU)—248,088Bottom 12%
AnTuTu 11 (GPU)—42,913Bottom 5%
AnTuTu 11 (Memory)—129,402Bottom 8%
AnTuTu 11 (UX)—187,771Bottom 12%
Geekbench 6 (single)1,229+28%Top 37%960Bottom 43%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,987+85%Top 33%2,150Bottom 38%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,233Bottom 39%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup