Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T90A vs Samsung Exynos 9610

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
Samsung Exynos 9610
—Inno Score
34.4CPU28
28.4GPU—
—Efficiencyspec-based20
2 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A

  • Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 28

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 9610
Announced20242018
Process—10 nm
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)Armv8

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 9610
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53
Max clock2.5 GHz+9%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 9610
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Arm Mali-G72 MP3

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 9610
Memory type—LPDDR4X

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 9610
Modem—Integrated LTE Cat-12
Max download—0.6 Gbps
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 9610
Max display—WQXGA (2560x1600)
Video capture—4K@120fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Samsung Exynos 9610
SpecHuawei Kirin T90ASamsung Exynos 9610
Geekbench 6 (single)1,229Top 37%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,987Top 33%—
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,233Bottom 39%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup