Skip to content
InnoReviews

Huawei Kirin T90A vs Unisoc T765

H
31.7Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T765
—Inno Score
34.4CPU24.5
28.4GPU55
—Efficiencyspec-based36
4 spec wins — Huawei Kirin T90A0 spec wins — Unisoc T765

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the Huawei Kirin T90A

  • Stronger CPU score: 34 vs 25
  • 107% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,987 vs 1,925
  • 67% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,229 vs 736

Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765

  • Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 28

General

General comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc T765
Announced20242023
Process—6 nm
ArchitectureARM (HiSilicon cores + Cortex-A510)Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc T765
Cores88
Core configuration1x2.5 GHz Big + 3x2.2 GHz Mid + 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A510 Little2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.5 GHz+9%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc T765
GPUHiSilicon Maleoon 910Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc T765
Memory type—LPDDR4X-2133

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc T765
Modem—Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL)
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth5.25.0

Media

Media comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc T765
Max display—FHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture—4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: Huawei Kirin T90A versus Unisoc T765
SpecHuawei Kirin T90AUnisoc T765
Geekbench 6 (single)1,229+67%Top 37%736Bottom 29%
Geekbench 6 (multi)3,987+107%Top 33%1,925Bottom 27%
3DMark Wild Life Extreme1,233Bottom 39%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup