MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
28CPU28
44.6Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based20
3 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 70250 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 7025
- 40% lower process: 6 nm vs 10 nm
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2018 |
| Process | 6 nm+40% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.5 GHz+9% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | LPDDR4X |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | — | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 664,087Bottom 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 255,422Bottom 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 57,772Bottom 17% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 150,942Bottom 24% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 199,951Bottom 17% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 950Bottom 41% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,250Bottom 40% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Dimensity 7400 UltraVSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Samsung Exynos 1280VSMediaTek Dimensity 7025vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS