Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc T8200

MediaTek Dimensity 810
33.8Inno Score
VS
Unisoc T8200
—Inno Score
25.2CPU28
—GPU55
30.9Benchmarks—
54.9Efficiencyspec-based36
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 8101 spec wins — Unisoc T8200

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: Unisoc T8200 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Unisoc T8200
Announced20212025
Process6 nm6 nm
TDP (typical)5 W—
ArchitectureArmv8.2Armv8.2

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Unisoc T8200
Cores88
Core configuration2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A552x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55
Max clock2.4 GHz+4%2.3 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Unisoc T8200
GPUArm Mali-G57 MC2Arm Mali-G57 MC2
GPU clock—850 MHz

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Unisoc T8200
Memory typeLPDDR4X-2133LPDDR4X-2133
Max bandwidth17.1 GB/s—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Unisoc T8200
ModemIntegrated 5G (sub-6)Integrated 5G (SA/NSA)
Max download2.8 Gbps—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 5Wi-Fi 6 (1x1, optional)
Bluetooth5.15.4

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Unisoc T8200
Max displayFHD+ @ 120HzFHD+ @ 120Hz
Video capture2K@30fps4K@30fps

Benchmarks

Benchmarks comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 810 versus Unisoc T8200
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 810Unisoc T8200
AnTuTu385,000—
Geekbench 6 (single)750Bottom 30%—
Geekbench 6 (multi)1,950Bottom 27%—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup