MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
35.4CPU28
31.4GPU—
56.1Benchmarks—
60.7Efficiencyspec-based20
4 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 81000 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 9610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 9610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8100
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 28
- 683% higher Max download: 4.7 Gbps vs 0.6 Gbps
- 50% lower process: 5 nm vs 10 nm
- 24% higher Max clock: 2.85 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 9610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2018 |
| Process | 5 nm+50% | 10 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz+24% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G72 MP3 |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | LPDDR4X |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated LTE Cat-12 |
| Max download | 4.7 Gbps+683% | 0.6 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz / FHD+ @ 168Hz | WQXGA (2560x1600) |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@120fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Samsung Exynos 9610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,050,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180Top 39% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,800Top 34% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,600Bottom 50% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Google Tensor G2VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Samsung Exynos 9611VSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSSamsung Exynos 9610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVS