MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Unisoc T765
35.4CPU24.5
31.4GPU55
56.1Benchmarks—
60.7Efficiencyspec-based36
4 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 81001 spec wins — Unisoc T765
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Unisoc T765 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8100
- Stronger CPU score: 35 vs 25
- 97% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 3,800 vs 1,925
- 60% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 1,180 vs 736
- 24% higher Max clock: 2.85 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 17% lower process: 5 nm vs 6 nm
Reasons to pick the Unisoc T765
- Stronger GPU score: 55 vs 31
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2023 |
| Process | 5 nm+17% | 6 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 7 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.1 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 2.85 GHz+24% | 2.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 |
| GPU clock | — | 850 MHz |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-3200 | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| Max bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G (sub-6) | Integrated 5G (SA/NSA), LTE Cat-15 (DL) / Cat-18 (UL) |
| Max download | 4.7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz / FHD+ @ 168Hz | FHD+ @ 120Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Unisoc T765 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,050,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180+60%Top 39% | 736Bottom 29% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,800+97%Top 34% | 1,925Bottom 27% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,600Bottom 50% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Google Tensor G2VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Samsung Exynos 1480VSMediaTek Dimensity 8100vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3VSUnisoc T765vs Samsung Exynos 1330VSUnisoc T765vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2VSUnisoc T765vs Samsung Exynos 1380VSUnisoc T765vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080VS