MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
36.6CPU20
33.1GPU—
53.6Benchmarks20
73.8Efficiency46.7
7 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 82001 spec wins — Unisoc Tiger T612
InnoReviews verdict
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 45.6 to 26.2, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+34) and efficiency (+27). Unisoc Tiger T612 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8200
- Stronger CPU score: 37 vs 20
- Stronger benchmarks score: 54 vs 20
- Stronger efficiency score: 74 vs 47
- 280% higher AnTuTu 10: 950,000 vs 250,000
- 244% higher Max bandwidth: 51.2 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
Reasons to pick the Unisoc Tiger T612
- 33% lower TDP (typical): 4 W vs 6 W
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Process | 4 nm+67% | 12 nm |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W | 4 W+33% |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv8.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 |
| Max clock | 3.1 GHz+72% | 1.8 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC6 | Arm Mali-G57 MP1 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 580 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5-6400 | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| Max bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s+244% | 14.9 GB/s |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated LTE Cat-7 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.0 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | — | FHD+ @ 60Hz |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Unisoc Tiger T612 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 950,000+280%Top 34% | 250,000Top 88% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,180+181%Top 37% | 420Top 84% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 3,750+150%Top 33% | 1,500Top 83% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 1,800Top 57% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2200VSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Apple A14 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8200vs Samsung Exynos 2100VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs MediaTek Helio G85VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450VSUnisoc Tiger T612vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460VS