MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
41CPU57.2
39.6GPU54.3
63.7Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
73.8Efficiency79.6
2 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 83507 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 51.1, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+16) and GPU (+15). MediaTek Dimensity 8350 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 8350
- 25% lower TDP (typical): 6 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 41
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 40
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 64
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 74
- 91% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 8,200 vs 4,300
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2025 |
| Process | 4 nm | 3 nm+25% |
| TDP (typical) | 6 W+25% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 + 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz+2% | 3.3 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 655 | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 5.2 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 1,420,000 | 2,150,000+51% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 1,400 | 2,300+64% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 4,300 | 8,200+91% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 2,600 | 4,400+69% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 8350vs Apple A15 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 8350vs Google Tensor G4VSMediaTek Dimensity 8350vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300VSMediaTek Dimensity 8350vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS

