MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ vs Samsung Exynos 1610
49.3CPU30.7
49.4GPU—
68.3Benchmarks—
69Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9200+1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
- Stronger CPU score: 49 vs 31
- 40% higher Max clock: 3.35 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | — |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz+40% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Mali-G68 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 690 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 1,700,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,050Top 19% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,600Top 22% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 25% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Samsung Exynos 1680VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VS