MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ vs Samsung Exynos 2600
49.3CPU72.6
49.4GPU77.4
68.3Benchmarks81.1
69Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9200+6 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 56.8, pulling ahead mainly in GPU (+28) and CPU (+23). MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 49
- Stronger GPU score: 77 vs 49
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 68
- 93% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 5,600
- 90% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 7,230 vs 3,800
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | 2 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 8 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 + 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 3.35 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 690 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-8533 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 68.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTuDifferent AnTuTu versions — not compared | 1,700,000 | 2,827,538Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | — | 947,776Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | — | 1,052,625Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | — | 347,409Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | — | 479,728Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,050Top 19% | 2,995+46%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 5,600Top 22% | 10,824+93%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 3,800Top 25% | 7,230+90%Top 7% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs MediaTek Dimensity 8500VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs Apple A16 BionicVSMediaTek Dimensity 9200+vs Samsung Exynos 2400eVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

