MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ vs Samsung Exynos 1610
55.9CPU30.7
56.3GPU—
73.5Benchmarks—
66.5Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9300+1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9300+
- Stronger CPU score: 56 vs 31
- 42% higher Max clock: 3.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024 | 2026 |
| Process | 4 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 + 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 3.4 GHz+42% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G720 MC12 | Mali-G68 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek APU 790 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5T-9600 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G modem | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9300+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,092,277Top 28% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 643,013Top 28% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 620,215Top 31% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 352,226Top 20% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 476,823Top 28% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,250Top 15% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 7,600Top 12% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 4,650Top 16% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Apple A17 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300VSMediaTek Dimensity 9300+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Samsung Exynos 1680VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VS