MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ vs Samsung Exynos 1610
66.2CPU30.7
69.8GPU—
80.7Benchmarks—
77.2Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9400+1 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610
InnoReviews verdict
No overall winner yet: Samsung Exynos 1610 lacks the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+
- Stronger CPU score: 66 vs 31
- 55% higher Max clock: 3.73 GHz vs 2.4 GHz
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
General
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 3 nm | — |
| TDP (typical) | 9 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv9.2 | — |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Core configuration | 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 + 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 + 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 | 2 + 6 |
| Max clock | 3.73 GHz+55% | 2.4 GHz |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Mali-G68 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | MediaTek NPU 890 | — |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR5X-10667 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 85.3 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated 5G-A modem | — |
| Max download | 7 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 7 | Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | 5.3 |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | WQHD+ @ 180Hz | — |
| Video capture | 8K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | Samsung Exynos 1610 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu | 2,784,235Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 829,825Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 946,941Top 14% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 370,838Top 9% | — |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 636,631Top 9% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 2,900Top 10% | — |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 9,000Top 7% | — |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 6,300Top 9% | — |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19 ProVSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400VSMediaTek Dimensity 9400+vs Apple A19VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Huawei Kirin 9030SVSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Samsung Exynos 1680VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs MediaTek Helio G200VSSamsung Exynos 1610vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4VS