Skip to content
InnoReviews

MediaTek Dimensity 9600M vs Samsung Exynos 1610

MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
—Inno Score
VS
S
—Inno Score
78.9CPU30.7
84Efficiencyspec-based—
1 spec wins — MediaTek Dimensity 9600M0 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 1610

InnoReviews verdict

No overall winner yet: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M and Samsung Exynos 1610 lack the published benchmark results an Inno Score requires, so there is no Inno Score to compare — we don't rank chips on their spec sheet alone. The spec table below still shows every difference we track.

Which would you pick?

Key differences

Reasons to pick the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M

  • Stronger CPU score: 79 vs 31
  • 75% higher Max clock: 4.21 GHz vs 2.4 GHz

Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 1610

No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.

General

General comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9600MSamsung Exynos 1610
Announced20262026
Process3 nm—
ArchitectureARMv9.3-A—

CPU

CPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9600MSamsung Exynos 1610
Cores88
Core configuration1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra + 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium + 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro2 + 6
Max clock4.21 GHz+75%2.4 GHz

GPU

GPU comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9600MSamsung Exynos 1610
GPUArm Mali-G1 Ultra MC12Mali-G68

AI

AI comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9600MSamsung Exynos 1610
NPUMediaTek NPU 990—

Memory

Memory comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9600MSamsung Exynos 1610
Memory typeLPDDR5X-10667—

Connectivity

Connectivity comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9600MSamsung Exynos 1610
ModemIntegrated 5G-A modem—
Wi-FiWi-Fi 7Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth6.05.3

Media

Media comparison: MediaTek Dimensity 9600M versus Samsung Exynos 1610
SpecMediaTek Dimensity 9600MSamsung Exynos 1610
Max displayWQHD+ @ 180Hz—
Video capture8K@60fps—

Related comparisons

Try another matchup