MediaTek Helio G200 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
25.6CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
41.3Benchmarks81.1
54.9Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — MediaTek Helio G20010 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 37.2, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+47) and benchmarks (+40). MediaTek Helio G200 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the MediaTek Helio G200
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 26
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 41
- 2111% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 47,609
- 415% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 2,100
- 386% higher AnTuTu: 2,827,538 vs 581,818
General
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 2 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 + 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.4 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | — | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Integrated LTE Cat-13 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.4 | — |
Media
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 144Hz | — |
| Video capture | 2K@30fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | MediaTek Helio G200 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 581,818Top 92% | 2,827,538+386%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 212,630Top 95% | 947,776+346%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 47,609Top 92% | 1,052,625+2111%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 152,829Top 78% | 347,409+127%Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 168,750Top 95% | 479,728+184%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 760Top 68% | 2,995+294%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,100Top 65% | 10,824+415%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 7% |
Related comparisons
MediaTek Helio G200vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 920VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200VSMediaTek Helio G200vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

