Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 2600
24.3CPU72.6
—GPU77.4
36Benchmarks81.1
54.9Efficiencyspec-based100
0 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 68510 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2600
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2600 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 80.4 to 34.9, pulling ahead mainly in CPU (+48) and benchmarks (+45). Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
No decisive spec advantages — this side competes on price and preference.
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2600
- Stronger CPU score: 73 vs 24
- Stronger benchmarks score: 81 vs 36
- 3462% higher AnTuTu 11 (GPU): 1,052,625 vs 29,548
- 622% higher Geekbench 6 (multi): 10,824 vs 1,500
- 537% higher Geekbench 6 (single): 2,995 vs 470
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2026 |
| Process | 6 nm | 2 nm+67% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W | — |
| Architecture | Armv8 | Armv9.3 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 + 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 | 1x Arm C1-Ultra + 3x Arm C1-Pro (high-performance) + 6x Arm C1-Pro (high-efficiency) |
| Max clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 | Samsung Xclipse 960 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Qualcomm Hexagon 686 | Samsung NPU |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-2133 | — |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X11 LTE | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 90Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | — |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | Samsung Exynos 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 11 | 471,425Top 100% | 2,827,538+500%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (CPU) | 185,372Top 100% | 947,776+411%Top 9% |
| AnTuTu 11 (GPU) | 29,548Top 100% | 1,052,625+3462%Top 12% |
| AnTuTu 11 (Memory) | 128,755Top 98% | 347,409+170%Top 23% |
| AnTuTu 11 (UX) | 127,750Top 100% | 479,728+276%Top 25% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 470Top 83% | 2,995+537%Top 9% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 1,500Top 84% | 10,824+622%Top 4% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | — | 7,230Top 7% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Huawei Kirin 9000SVSQualcomm Snapdragon 685vs Apple A12 BionicVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs MediaTek Dimensity 9500VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5VSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 EliteVSSamsung Exynos 2600vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5VS

