Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
25.5CPU57.2
21.3GPU54.3
32.5Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
54.9Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6958 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 30.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+42) and GPU (+33). Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 26
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 21
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 55
- 1122% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 360
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2025 |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+37% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+50% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 5G | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 2.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 411,000 | 2,150,000+423% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 906 | 2,300+154% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,013 | 8,200+307% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 360 | 4,400+1122% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs MediaTek Helio G99VSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050VSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300+VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS
