Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Samsung Exynos 2500
25.5CPU57.2
21.3GPU54.3
32.5Benchmarks74.2
—AI85.9
54.9Efficiency79.6
1 spec wins — Qualcomm Snapdragon 6958 spec wins — Samsung Exynos 2500
InnoReviews verdict
Samsung Exynos 2500 wins this mobile chipset face-off, 66.1 to 30.8, pulling ahead mainly in benchmarks (+42) and GPU (+33). Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 still makes sense if its price or standout specs fit your needs better.
Which would you pick?
Key differences
Reasons to pick the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
- 37% lower TDP (typical): 5 W vs 8 W
Reasons to pick the Samsung Exynos 2500
- Stronger CPU score: 57 vs 26
- Stronger GPU score: 54 vs 21
- Stronger benchmarks score: 74 vs 33
- Stronger efficiency score: 80 vs 55
- 1122% higher 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 4,400 vs 360
General
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2025 |
| Process | 6 nm | 3 nm+50% |
| TDP (typical) | 5 W+37% | 8 W |
| Architecture | Armv8.2 | Armv9.2 |
CPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 | 10+25% |
| Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 + 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X925 + 2x2.75 GHz Cortex-A725 + 5x2.36 GHz Cortex-A725 + 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520 |
| Max clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.3 GHz+50% |
GPU
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Samsung Xclipse 950 |
AI
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| NPU | Hexagon NPU | Samsung NPU |
| AI performance | — | 59 TOPS |
Memory
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Memory type | LPDDR4X-4266 | LPDDR5X |
| Max bandwidth | 17.1 GB/s | — |
Connectivity
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 5G | Integrated Exynos 5G modem |
| Max download | 2.5 Gbps | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 | — |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | — |
Media
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| Max display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | — |
| Video capture | 1080p@60fps | 8K@30fps |
Benchmarks
| Spec | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Samsung Exynos 2500 |
|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu 10 | 411,000Top 71% | 2,150,000+423%Top 8% |
| Geekbench 6 (single) | 906Top 60% | 2,300+154%Top 12% |
| Geekbench 6 (multi) | 2,013Top 67% | 8,200+307%Top 9% |
| 3DMark Wild Life Extreme | 360Top 98% | 4,400+1122%Top 17% |
Related comparisons
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Samsung Exynos 990VSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730GVSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765GVSQualcomm Snapdragon 695vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18VSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A18 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Apple A17 ProVSSamsung Exynos 2500vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3VS
